Tcp

Since a short while I have a gigabit setup at home. My laptop has a e1000 Intel NIC, my desktop a Broadcom NIC.While playing with Snort_inline and netpipe-tcp, I noticed something odd. I got tcp packets that had the ‘Don’t Fragment’ option set, but were still bigger than the mtu size of the link. Snort_inline read packets of up to 26kb from the queue, and wireshark and tcpdump were seeing the packets as well. This was only for outgoing packets on the e1000 NIC. The receiving pc saw the packets split up in multiple packets that were honoring the mtu size. This got me thinking that some form of offloading must be taking place and indeed this was the case: ...

With the recent Snort vulnerabilities we had to make a choice if we would backport the fixes to our Snort_inline 2.6.0.2 patch or that we would upgrade to 2.6.1.2. Upgrading makes most sense since SourceFire improves Snort with every release, but since the upgrade process has been very painful the last couple of releases, we weren’t really looking forward to it. Earlier I wrote about my testing with Subversion for Snort_inline, and I found out that using Subversion made the upgrade procedure much easier and much less time consuming. So upgrading it was. Generally there were little changes to the Snort_inline patch required. ...

Development of Snort_inline 2.6 experienced a bit of a setback when William and I discovered that the new Stream4inline had some issues with detecting certain attacks. Since we are scanning the reassembled stream certain detection plugins didn’t work as expected. Basically every detection plugin that uses absolute offsets from the packet start is messed up when we scan the reassembled stream only. This is because the start of the reassembled stream doesn’t match with the start of the last packet added to this stream. Most TCP sigs are using offsets match against the start of the stream, or relative matches. For example a rule like: ...

I have spend the last week trying to find a very annoying bug that caused Snort_inline to go into 100% CPU on certain traffic. It kept working, only my P3 500Mhz home gateway slowed down to between 2kb/s and 25kb/s, while normally it handles the full 325kb/s for my DSL line at around 25% CPU. Snort comes with a number of performance measurement options. In 2.6 –enable-perfprofiling was introduced. Also, –enable-profile builds Snort for use with gprof. Next to those you can use strace and ltrace with the -c option to see the ammount of time spend in the several functions. I already knew the problem was related to my new Stream4 code, since running Snort_inline without the ‘stream4inline’ option made the problem go away. So my performance debugging and code reviews were focussed on that code. However, the performance statistics showed no functions that took large ammounts of time in Stream4.

No, it’s not released. But it wil be soon… really! William has done most of the hard work of porting our Snort_inline patch from 2.4.5 to 2.6. I have mostly been working on improving the stream4inline modification. I have written about this before. Like the stream4inline modification in Snort_inline 2.4.5 it scans the stream in a sliding window, making it possible to drop an attack detected in the reassembled stream. The new code does the same but is much faster, at the cost of higher memory usage. ...

William Metcalf recently wrote a bait-and-switch plugin for Snort_inline. The idea is that when a rule matches on certain traffic this plugin loads an iptables rule into the system that redirects the offending host to another server. This can present the user an error message such as “Access Denied” for example, but this server can also have al kinds of sniffing tools, or even be a honeypot. As the plugin currently creates an iptables rule it only works with linux. Also, it has some difficulty with existing iptables rulesets that might be maintained by other programs, such as my own Vuurmuur. My idea is to investigate whether or not it is possible to simply do the redirection in Snort_inline itself. By rewriting the ipaddress in the IP header, it might work as well. Naturally, this would need to be done for every packet, but with a connection to either the flow engine or the stream engine, this should be able to work… just a thought… ...

Currently I am rewriting a modification of the TCP reassembler in Snort_inline. Snort’s TCP reassembler is called Stream4 and it works fairly well in IDS mode, however it has some serious issues in inline mode. The biggest and most important issue is that Snort_inline cannot block an attack if it is detected in the reassembled stream. In Snort_inline 2.4 we made our first attempt to fix this with the stream4inline modification. ...