<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bro-Ids on Inliniac</title>
    <link>https://inliniac.net/blog/tag/bro-ids/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bro-Ids on Inliniac</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://inliniac.net/blog/tag/bro-ids/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>RAID 2011 Thoughts</title>
      <link>https://inliniac.net/blog/2011/09/24/raid-2011-thoughts/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://inliniac.net/blog/2011/09/24/raid-2011-thoughts/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The last few days I&amp;rsquo;ve been at the Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID) conference in California. Overall it has been a very pleasant and interesting experience. The nice California weather was certainly helping a lot!&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve seen all talks and some were very interesting. However, being a Suricata IDS developer, I was not just interested in research for the hell of it, but I was actively scouting for ideas we could implement into Suricata. In this respect the conference was highly disappointing. Although with some of the talks I thought the idea was applicable in general security, like Erik Bosmans high speed memory tainting detection, I found nothing like that for NIDS.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
