<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Freebsd on Inliniac</title>
    <link>https://inliniac.net/blog/tag/freebsd/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Freebsd on Inliniac</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:41:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://inliniac.net/blog/tag/freebsd/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Snort_inline updated to 2.8.0.1 in SVN</title>
      <link>https://inliniac.net/blog/2008/01/09/snort_inline-updated-to-2801-in-svn/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://inliniac.net/blog/2008/01/09/snort_inline-updated-to-2801-in-svn/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve just committed an update to Snort_inline&amp;rsquo;s SVN. It brings it to the Snort 2.8.0.1 level. It supports both IPv4 and IPv6 on IPQ and NFQ. I have not been able to test IPFW on IPv6, so I don&amp;rsquo;t think that will work currently.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This update removes the libdnet dependency and replaces it with libnet 1.1. To be able to send ICMPv6 unreachable packets you will need the libnet 1.1 patch I wrote a while ago. You can find that &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.inliniac.net/blog/2007/10/16/libnet-11-ipv6-fixes-and-additions.html&#34;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Get the latest Snort_inline by checking out SVN:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Differences between Snort and Snort_inline</title>
      <link>https://inliniac.net/blog/2007/05/14/differences-between-snort-and-snort_inline/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://inliniac.net/blog/2007/05/14/differences-between-snort-and-snort_inline/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every few weeks the same question comes up: what is the difference between Snort in inline mode and Snort_inline. This makes sense, because the Snort_inline documentation and website fail to explain it. In this post I will try to highlight the main differences. In general I can say that we try to develop Snort_inline as a patchset on top of Snort. Snort_inline is focused at improving the &lt;em&gt;inline&lt;/em&gt; part of Snort. Originally of course, Snort&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;inline&lt;/em&gt; capabilities were developed in the Snort_inline project. With Snort 2.3.0RC1 they were merged into mainline Snort.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
