<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Martin-Roesch on Inliniac</title>
    <link>https://inliniac.net/blog/tag/martin-roesch/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Martin-Roesch on Inliniac</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://inliniac.net/blog/tag/martin-roesch/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Snort and the GPL version 3</title>
      <link>https://inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/29/snort-and-the-gpl-version-3/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://inliniac.net/blog/2007/06/29/snort-and-the-gpl-version-3/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Today the final version of the &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html&#34;&gt;GPL version 3&lt;/a&gt; was released. This is interesting from many perspectives, and one of them is Snort licensing. Much has been written about Snort and the GPL lately, but that was all about new license language introduced with Snort 3.0 alpha and not about the currently maintained and developed 2.6 and 2.7 branches. When I&amp;rsquo;m talking about Snort here and now, I mean those versions prior to 3.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
